1.12.2004
MEMORANDUM
THE WORKSHOP OF THE NORDIC BALTIC DEAF SPORTS FEDERATION NBDSF
ON 27-28.11.2004 IN
BACKGROUND
The Finnish Athletic Association of the Deaf (FAAD) was elected to lead the activities of NBDSF for the years 2003-
Because of this honorary task SKUL applied for
to develop the NBDSF activities for the four year period in question.
The Ministry of Education in
In connection with the EDSO Congress in June 2004 in
In
In
Summary from the workshop on 27-28.11.2004
The objectives of the workshop were fulfilled extremely well. Especially gratifying was the fact that all the NBDSF member countries were represented in
Vilna. The activity of participating was a clear sign on that the continuation and development of the NBDSF activities were felt to be a very important issue for all.
It should be noted that the workshop was not an official meeting of NBDSF in its nature, but the next ordinary meeting will be held on 28-29.5.2005 in
However, this original memorandum will need to be approved with a signature of the president of every country, after which this memorandum with its
appendices will be sent to the Ministry of Education in
These principle decisions, which were made at the workshop, will be officially approved at the meeting in
At the workshop the activity situation of each NBDSF country was first mapped out. After this, the SWOT analysis was drafted for the organisation for the
first time in NBDSF history, in other words, the strengths, weaknesses, possibilities and threats in the NBDSF activities were viewed. This SWOT analysis was also as the base for
the plan of action for the years 2004-2007.
FAAD was given the authority to make this plan of action more concrete to be the basis for the funding application for the Ministry of Education,
especially from the point of view of the SWOT analysis.
In addition to the above mentioned issues, lively discussion was carried out, for instance, on the valuation of the exercise and sports of deaf people in
comparison to the Paralympics activities, if Deaflympic Games should be joined with the Paralympics activities in order for it to receive more media coverage?
Further, plenty of discussion was carried out on the identification of the implanted hearing-impaired and hard-of-hearing people with deaf sports
activities in the future; if the implanted hearing-impaired persons are a threat or possibility for deaf sports? If the organisations of deaf sports should change their names in
order for the hard-of-hearing and implanted deaf/hearing-impaired people could identify themselves with the activities of the deaf sports organisations? Does the number of sign
language user sportsmen decrease in the deaf competitions? Who do the deaf sports organisations serve in the future? Also many other questions were discussed, some of them received
clear responses and solution models, some not.
It was difficult to find an unambiguous response or absolute truth to the questions mentioned earlier or even to take a standpoint in them. However, it was
important to have the possibility to discuss these issues together and in a way to stop and think how the NBDSF member countries see the present situation and the future of deaf
sports.
It was noted that the financial and activity resources of the deaf sports organisations in the NBDSF countries vary greatly even when compared with each
other. In addition, the political and societal situation of each NBDSF country, and through that, the status and appreciation of the deaf sports organisations vary very much in the
different NBDSF countries. From the member countries
There was consensus on that every deaf sports organisation should inform about its objectives and activities to all levels of society more than before, in
other words to the political decision-makers, officers in the ministries, responsible directors, media, sponsors and other co-operation partners, paralympic organisations,
different kinds of hearing sports organisations, and also to the general public as far as it is possible. Through the general awareness on the deaf sports activities the attitudes
and appreciation of hearing people will increase towards deaf sports.
It was jointly felt that the increased appreciation of the paralympic sports activities recently is not a
threat in deaf sports activities, but a possibility.
However, the self respect of the deaf sports has suffered, in a sense that without deaf sports activities there hardly would be any paralympic activities
either. Deaf people have first founded their own national and international sports organisations already 40-50 years before other sports organisations of people with disabilities
were founded. Viewed from this background, deaf sports activities should not be drowned in the shadow of paralympic activities and into oblivion, as it has been felt in the deaf
sports organisations lately. In addition, the decrease of financial support for deaf sports activities, compared to the paralympic sports activities, is felt to be a big threat. In
spite of all threatening images, the sports organisations should concentrate especially in the quality of their activities.
It was also emphasised that the paralympic movement is not aware of the activities of CISS either. Arne Lundqvist told about his experiences in the
Paralympic Games in
The possibilities for deaf advocacy work compared with other sports organisations and paralympic organisations are more limited. Deaf people have the only
sports organisation, including the sports organisations of people with disabilities, whose language is something else beside the language of the majority, in other words the spoken
language. Deaf people use sign language as their mother language. The representatives of the majority language users, in other words the users of spoken language, naturally have
more possibilities in influencing advocacy work and information activities than the representatives from a minority language.
It was felt at the workshop that it was a very positive issue to be able to discuss about the status of deaf people, the situation in society, and new
changes as truthfully as possible and with open eyes – without extreme fanatism and absoluteness.
At the end of the workshop every participating country had a possibility to inform the others about their own issues and there is a separate memorandum on
these issues, which will be appended.
OTHER ISSUES AND NOTICES OF THE WORKSHOP
New logo for NBDSF
SDI introduced a new logo model for the NBDSF. After voting, almost a unanimous decision was made to choose, by a so-called principle decision, the second
from the top alternative out of the five different logo-alternatives. Urban Mesch will be responsible for the purchase of the chosen logo model and will send them to
Sports festival for deaf people from the NBDSF member countries
The SDI motion of organising a sports festival every fourth year in the summer and winter sports was noted and approved in principle. In the first phase,
the sports festivals in question will be organised in
NBDSF WWW-pages
It was decided that the activities of the www-pages will be continued in spite of the rare updating. The meaningfulness of the homepages was also discussed.
Because of the NBDSF own image and profile the continuation of the homepages was felt to be important.
It was decided that the address of the NBDSF homepages will stay the same, in other words www.skul.org/nbdsf.
As an idea for development it was decided to include in the homepages all the NBDSF record lists of all sports, different kinds of NBDSF history
information, minutes, agendas, invitations, press releases etc. All member countries promised to give their input to improving the updating of the homepages.
It was
noted that the last minutes of the EDSO Congress in
Björn Roine brought regards from the EDSO Board meeting, which had been held in October in
Kliewer does not continue his work as the EDSO sports director, but has stepped down from the activities completely. The EDSO Board is delegating
Kliewer’s previous tasks among themselves.
The EDSO General Secretariat is in
It was noted that the licence responsibilities and information activities to EDSO, of the games the sports clubs of the EDSO member countries organise, are
badly taken care of. Björn Roine mentioned that the results made in these so-called illegal games will not be approved in the EDSO record statistics.
NBDSF decided to make a proposal to the next EDSO Congress that, on part of the NBDSF own games, these game licence fees would not need to be paid to EDSO.
The justification is that the NBDSF countries pay the participation fees directly to the organising country.
It was noted that the EDSO Hungarian Board member, Bela Panyi is responsible for these game licence fees. He should also be informed separately about these
games.
It was hoped that in the future NBDSF could organise as many-sided seminars and workshops with different themes as possible. The participants of the
above-mentioned events should change as much as possible in order not to have the same group meeting all the time.
Information was received on the summaries of travel plans of the NBDSF member countries for the forthcoming 20th Deaflympic Games on 5-16.1.2005
in
At the end of the workshop every participating country thanked the host country
NBDSF President Jarmo Järventausta closed the workshop by thanking the leader of the workshop
In witness thereof the memorandum
Jarmo Järventausta
President
Secretary
NBDSF
NBDSF
APPENDICES:
NBDSF SWOT
NBDSF BUDGET AND PLAN OF ACTION FOR 2005-2007
NBDSF APPEAL TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION IN
PROGRAMME OF THE WORKSHOP
PARTICIPANTS OF THE WORKSHOP
THE NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS AND TEAMS FROM THE NBDSF COUNTRIES IN THE DEAFLYMPIC GAMES IN
NBDSF
SWOT
STRENTGHS
· The history of NBDSF: founded originally in 1912 (NDI), the oldest sports organisation of the people with
disabilities, traditions, culture.
· Regular joint seminars and meetings
· Respect and equality of the member countries towards one another
· Know-how and regeneration
· Functional possibilities
WEAKNESSES
· Status in society, attitudes and valuation, note: Paralympic activities, media
· NBDSF is lacking a clear and stable administration
· NBDSF own fundraising and financial possibilities + personnel resources
· Financial possibilities of the NBDSF member countries themselves to increase co-operation
· The status of NBDSF in EDSO should be clearer (licence fees, joint advocacy work)
· Decrease in the activity of deaf people in the field of sports competitions
· The functional activity and know-how of the sports clubs in the member countries
· Strong regression in the individual sports
· The organisation is not very well-known in the sports clubs
· Information work on the NBDSF activities in the member countries
OPPORTUNITIES
· To organise joint seminars, workshops and meetings with different themes for deaf people and other
hearing-impaired people with different ages – exchange of information
· Youth activities; sports camps, sports competitions
· Increasing activities at the club level
· Information work, Internet, www-pages
· NBDSF 100th anniversary in 2012, a year with a special theme
· Raising the NBDSF image with quite a small input
· Sports festivals in summer and winter sports every fourth year. The sports clubs of the member countries as a
special target group
THREATS
· The identity of deaf people, compare the socio-cultural and medical viewpoint on deafness
· Decrease in the activity of deaf sports competition activities
· Decrease in the valuation of deaf sports
· Decrease in the self determination of the federations and clubs – integration in the paralympic activities (this
can also be seen as a possibility)
· Continuation and funding of the NBDSF activities
· The know-how in deaf sports activities and lack of training in the tightening competition in society
NBDSF
BUDGET AND PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE YEARS 2005-2007
Background:
The total budget of the plan of action below for the period in question is
On bigger part the fulfilment of the plan of action in practice is dependent on the views on the Ministry of Education in
If the Ministry of Education in
As justification for the above we could mention, for instance, that the government of the previous leader country has had a positive approach to the
funding of the NBDSF activities, so the government of the new leader country could see that the funding for the NBDSF activities is justified.
The Ministry of Education granted NBDSF
It is difficult to make a more detailed plan of action before we know the final decision on the funding for NBDSF activities. After we receive the final
word, the FAAD Board will confirm and approve the budget. The final approval of the budget will be made in
The frame of the budget would consist of the following items annually:
NBDSF administration/Finland
NBDSF information activities, materials
Internet, fundraising
One seminar/workshop/year
(Accommodation-, meals of the participants
and meeting expenses)
Individual training for the member countries
(expert presentations, visits)
Medals, diplomas, record statistics
Youth festivals
Other expenses
THE
APPEAL FROM THE NBDSF TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION IN
Distinguished Ministry of Education in
We, the Presidents of the NBDSF member countries appeal to You that you would take a positive approach to the
This would be very encouraging for the continuation of the NBDSF activities.
The leadership country of the NBDSF changes every four years, and the possibilities of the next leader country to receive funding from its own government
would be much better after the Finnish example.
NBDSF has not previously applied similar kind of funding for its activities separately.
The sports of deaf and hearing-impaired people, as well as the NBDSF activities, are undergoing a period of transition. Financial support is of utmost
importance to the sensible continuation of the NBDSF activities. The objective of NBDSF is to get the oldest organisation of the people with disabilities in the world to the level
which the modern age requires by its 100th anniversary year in year 2012. Viewed against this background, our funding application for
Sincerely yours,
Jussi Raisio
Finnish Athletic Association of the Deaf
Estonian Deaf Sport Union
Ragna Magnusdottir
Icelandic Deaf Sports Association
Varis Strazdinins
Latvian Deaf Sports Federation
Aleksas Jasiunas
Lithuanian Deaf Sports Federation
Björn Raine
Norwegian Deaf Sports Association
Jessica Rohde
Danish Deaf Sports Association
Arne Lundquist
Swedish Deaf Sports Federation